• Blog
  • Shop
  • Resources
  • FAQ (Ask TGS)
  • About
  • Archive
  • Contact
  • Sign In My Account
Menu

The Gentleman Stationer

Vintage Living in the Modern World.
  • Blog
  • Shop
  • Resources
  • FAQ (Ask TGS)
  • About
  • Archive
  • Contact
  • Sign In My Account

Initial Impressions: Wing Sung 618 and Wing Sung 698 Piston Fillers

February 7, 2018

If you’ve been following the links in my Deals and Drops posts over the past few months, you might suspect that I've been dabbling in the world of ultra low-cost Chinese pens. You notice I don’t use the word “cheap”, because I don’t necessarily agree with all that term implies, namely low quality. Indeed, the first two pens that I’ve tried recently - two piston filling demonstrators from Wing Sung - are a far cry from the fragile, basically disposable pens that I became familiar with from my early days in this hobby.

Previous Experience

My prior experience with inexpensive Chinese pens was primarily with Jinhao, and as we all know I’m not the biggest fan. I’ve owned some Jinhao pens that were serviceable writers; however, at the same time, I’ve received Jinhao pens with severe flaws in the finish, and the Monteverde Monza / Jinhao 992 has barrel-cracking issues in addition to quality control problems with the nibs. I did purchase a Kaigelu Duofold clone from now-defunct isellpens.com that was an ok writer, but the pen was also extremely heavy due to the brass barrel. Based on my experience so far, the Wing Sung pens are a cut above their competitors: they are relatively well-built, functional pens that I can actually see myself using, provided they hold up over the long term. 

Design and Build

For my initial foray back into the Chinese pen market, I opted to try two Wing Sung demonstrators, the Wing Sung 618 and the Wing Sung 698. Both of these pens are attractive. Wing Sung did a good job of polishing the acrylic for this price point, and the clips feel secure. It remains to be seen how the pens will hold up over the long term (i.e., more than a month), but when you’re operating at this price point durability is one of those things you may have to sacrifice (or just assume that it’s reflected in the lower price).  

I like that the Wing Sung pens (on the right) sport the clean lines and modern aesthetics of the TWSBI 580 and TWSBI Eco (two pens on the left), but in a slimmer, more streamlined package.

The 618 posts quite well; the 698 doesn't post at all.

View fullsize Wing Sung 618 Unposted
View fullsize Wing Sung 618 Posted
View fullsize Wing Sung 698 Unposted - Pen Doesn't Post

The 618 is approximately the same size and shape as the vintage Parker 51, though the addition of the piston filler, threaded cap, and chrome cap band do change the look of the pen by modernizing it quite a bit. I would compare the 698 to a slimmer mash-up of the TWSBI 580 and the TWSBI Eco. I could use both Wing Sung pens very comfortably, though I wish the 698 posted.

While both pens have "Wing Sung" engraved on the barrel, for some reason the 698 has "Lucky" written on the clip. 

A note on design. Chinese pen companies have been known for their “liberal” approach to intellectual property rights. With the possible exception of the “Arrow Clip” (which I believe is the subject of an ongoing dispute between Parker and Hero, Wing Sung's affiliated company, dating back to the 1940s), these two pens feature more original design elements than I’m accustomed to seeing, placing 618 pens more into the “homage” or “fantasy pen” category. The 698, to my knowledge, is distinct enough from anything else on the market to stand on its own.

Filling System and Writing Experience

This is where these pens almost lost me. While Wing Sung markets these pens as “piston fillers,” the filling system is a touch janky, for lack of a better term. This filling system is more accurately described, in my opinion, as a hybrid syringe filler / piston filler, since in order to get a “full fill” - and a full fill on these pens holds a lot of ink - you need to hold the blind cap steady and pull the piston out a bit as you turn, or else the blind cap will screw down and stop the piston before the pen is full of ink. It takes a few tries to master, and is tricky enough that I wouldn’t recommend this as a first fountain pen, despite the low price.

UPDATE: Based on reader recommendations, I tried again with the piston on these pens. As it turns out, Wing Sung uses a "locking piston" system, where in order to engage the piston you have to first pull out on the blind cap, after which the pen works like any regular piston filler, with no "syringe" action. Once you fill the pen, you push down on the blind cap to lock it back in place. It's slightly more complex than a typical piston filler, but it does work fairly well. I still wouldn't recommend this pen for beginners, since the instructions from Wing Sung don't offer clear instructions on how to fill the pen (unless you read Chinese). Also, the locking blind cap is held in place by small plastic "teeth," and I'm interested in seeing how those hold up over time. 

I love vintage-style hooded sections, and other than the Aurora DuoCart and the Lamy 2000, not many pen companies use them today. 

At the end of the day, it took me two or three attempts to get a full fill, and wow, these pens hold a lot of ink. I’ve been writing with the 618 almost non-stop for the past couple of weeks, and it’s still ¼ full. If I’m only refilling these pens once or twice a month, I can live with the temperamental piston.

View fullsize Wing Sung 698 Nib (Top)
View fullsize Wing Sung 698 Clear Feed and Section

The nibs are unremarkable, and I’d characterize both as “Western fine”. The nib on my 618 is fairly toothy, and I’ll probably take some micromesh to it to smooth it out. The nib on the 698 writes extremely well unmodified, and looks and feels similar to the nib on a Pilot Kakuno.

Takeaways and Where to Buy

Right now, I’m categorizing this article as my “initial impressions” as opposed to a full review, because I still have some durability concerns about how long these pens will last and I want to revisit them at some point in the future. Given the low price point, I expect that some users will experience cracking in the acrylic, and that others will have problems with the “pistons,” but that’s to be expected with less expensive pens. Even TWSBI took a while to get the QC right at a much higher price point.

That said, my initial impressions are favorable. I’ve enjoyed using these unique pens, both of which have decent nibs that wrote immediately out of the box without any adjustment, which unfortunately is more than you can say for many pens that cost 2-3 times as much. Again, I would not recommend these as anyone’s first piston filling fountain pen - stick with the TWSBI Eco - but if you’re looking to vary your collection with some inexpensive transparent demonstrators, give these a try.  

I purchased these pens from Amazon, where prices will vary. (See a link here for the 618 and a link here for the 698.) Though there are other ways to source these pens, I prefer to rely on Amazon when I can because (1) Prime shipping is generally faster, and (2) I like Amazon’s buyer protection services. The 698 is only available as a clear demonstrator, with chrome or gold plated trim, but the 618 comes in a wide range of colors, and I have a transparent dark blue with silver trim version on its way to me, via the slow boat, apparently. Look for more pics and an updated opinion in the future! 

Disclaimer: I purchased these pens with my own money, for my own use. This post does contain affiliate links.

In Pens Tags Pens, Wing Sung, Demonstrator, Chinese Pens
3 Comments

Pilot's Custom Heritage 92 Demonstrator in Orange Acrylic

Pen Review: Pilot Custom Heritage 92

March 2, 2016

I'm really mad at Pilot (or maybe I should be mad at the U.S. Distributor, Pilot U.S.A.). Why? Because Pilot makes a pen that is nice-looking, and an exceptional writer, but is only available in the U.S. in one color with an MSRP set twice as high as in Japan.  I'd go so far as to say that this pen could be a flagship offering for Pilot here in the States, yet it gets little love or attention, probably because of the price.

The pen that I am talking about, is of course, the Custom Heritage 92 demonstrator.  The clear version is sold by U.S. retailers, including PenChalet. Pilot also makes three different colors of the demonstrator in the same transparent plastics as the Custom 74 line:  Blue, Orange, and Smoke.  Unfortunately, as of the time of writing, these versions are Japan-only, but are still easily accessible through Amazon and eBay.     

General Build and Appearance

The Custom Heritage is a solid pen.  Some colored plastic demonstrators feel cheap, but not this one.  The barrel, cap, and especially the piston mechanism (discussed further below) all feel especially solid.  It's a nice mid-sized pen:  big enough to use comfortably posted or unposted, but not so huge that it weighs down the front of a shirt pocket or is otherwise inconvenient for daily carry. 

View fullsize Pilot Custom Heritage Posted
View fullsize Pilot Custom Heritage Unposted

As I mentioned, the color scheme on these demonstrators is substantially similar to the color scheme on the Custom 74 demonstrators available here in the US.  One difference is that the end caps are transparent gray, which sets off nicely against the orange. I've always wanted a pen in Pilot's clear orange acrylic--now I just have to pick up a blue version as well, which has a sapphire-like quality and is also stunning.  

The piston knob on the Custom Heritage is gray, which accents the orange nicely.

The Fine-Medium "FM" Nib

The Custom Heritage sports a 14K gold number 5 nib.  Pilot's standard gold nibs are springy--they're not semi-flex nibs like the "FA" nibs and the nibs on a Pilot/Namiki Falcon, but you can squeeze out a touch of line variation.  What's unique about the nib I have, though, is the width.  Pilot makes a "FM" nib (or a Fine-Medium), which is the perfect width for me to use as a daily writer. On more absorbent paper, the FM nib leans more to the medium side; on Rhodia or Clairefontaine, the nib writes more like a Western fine.  In terms of ink flow, the pen writes perfectly out of the box.  It has just a hint of feedback.    

Pilot Number 5 "FM" nib in 14K.

You can definitely squeeze some line variation out of the Pilot FM nib--it's not a nail--but I wouldn't call it "flex" or even "semi-flex."

A Piston Filler that Fills Completely and Is Easy To Clean

I saved what I consider the best aspect of this pen for last.  In my piece on pen cleaning that I published a while back, I lamented how piston fillers had fallen out of my good graces because they were more difficult to clean.  Not so with this pen!  The piston mechanism is smooth and extremely efficient, meaning that the pen will take a full fill of ink, and on the flip side, will take a full fill of water when you are trying to clean it.  Many piston fillers will only fill the ink chamber 3/4 or 2/3 full, which not only fails to maximize the ink capacity of the pen but requires repeated flushing to clean it.  I've been using this pen with red ink (among the most difficult colors to clean), and I've been able to flush this pen completely clean with only 3-4 cycles of the piston. 

Flushing the Pilot Custom Heritage 92 when I received it for the first time. This pen is full of water. Notice that there is only one slightly visible air bubble in the upper left of the ink chamber.

The Pricing Conundrum

I'm not a huge fan of clear demonstrators, so I didn't have to decide between buying internationally through Amazon or supporting a U.S.-based retailer.  It is, however, unfortunate that Pilot sets the MSRP on the Custom Heritage 92 at $275 in the U.S.  (Retailer "street price" tends to be around $220.) That's too high for this pen, regardless of how nice it is, and I would think this makes it nearly impossible for U.S. retailers (at least those abiding by the distributors' rules) to compete on this pen. The Lamy 2000 typically sells at a price point between $120-140, and I'd pay that for the Custom Heritage in a heartbeat.

Takeaways

I love this pen, and it's jumped to the top of my queue since I received it a few weeks back.  (I do a lot of copy editing, and there's something about writing with red ink in an orange demonstrator that I find incredibly satisfying.)  Moreover, at the $110 price point, this pen is up there with the Lamy 2000 as an option for purchasing a first gold-nibbed pen, especially if you are looking for a piston filler.  I purchased this pen off of Amazon, though they are also readily available on eBay as well, sometimes for under $100.        

Some Extra Credit

A few other people have reviewed the Pilot Custom Heritage.  Mike Dudek over at The Clicky Post reviewed the clear version with a medium nib, and Pete Denison has reviewed the blue version, also in a FM nib. 

If you're interested in reading further on the reasons why pens are priced differently in various markets, I recommend to you this piece by Ian at Pens!Paper!Pencils!  You can also check out PIlot's reply to Ian's piece, as well as this reaction by Dr. Deans at Pen Economics.     

In Pens Tags Pen Review, Pilot, Pilot Custom Heritage, Demonstrator
1 Comment
Store Location
Visit the T.G.S. Curated SHOP
*New* Updated "Best Pens" Guide (2025)
TGS x Hinze Pens Violet Tendencies Taschenstift Fountain Pen
Hierarchies of Fountain Pen Friendly Paper
Allex Scissors arrayed on a desk showing link to desk accessories

Join Our Patreon!
Subscribe to the TGS E-mail List

Featured Posts

Featured
Pilot-Iroshizuku-Yama-Budo-Writing-Sample.jpeg
May 24, 2025
Joe's Picks: Five Favorite Inks From Pilot's Iroshizuku Lineup
May 24, 2025
May 24, 2025
Yamamoto-Gray-Paper-Sampler-Set.jpeg
May 10, 2025
Discovering Unusual Paper: "Paper Tasting" Sets from Yamamoto Paper
May 10, 2025
May 10, 2025
Four-Micarta-Fountain-Pens.jpeg
Apr 19, 2025
Yes, Micarta for me! I finally got my hands on Some Micarta Pens, Plus My Own Special Edition
Apr 19, 2025
Apr 19, 2025
The Gentleman Stationer RSS

© Digital Divide Media, LLC, 2014-present.

All content is the exclusive property of Digital Divide Media, LLC, d/b/a The Gentleman Stationer, including “The Gentleman Stationer” website and trademark, and should not be reproduced without express written permission.  All rights reserved.

All content containing paid advertising, affiliate links, or sponsored content will be plainly disclosed by a disclaimer when/if featured.

Contact Information

Store Shipping Policy and Return Policy

Privacy Policy

Cookie Policy

Terms and Conditions

Powered by Squarespace